For a few urban church starters, launching a new church is like fishing on days when you find active fish at every spot. It seems like even your mistakes produce good results.
But most urban church starters find their experience to be quite different. You follow the best advice, and your results are meager. You work hard, maybe harder than most, and still, your results are well below what you had hoped. Progress is slower than you projected. If that were not enough, a key partner fails to follow through with promises they made. They tell you circumstances have changed, and they wished they could do more.
The church starters in the latter group are not asked to speak at the conferences and nobody calls to interview them for missions publications. Their partners, the ones that don’t bail on them, begin to treat them like an ex-brother-in-law. Too often these starters begin to doubt their abilities, and not a few question their calling. Financial and ministry strains chip away at their families, and then the pull factors increase. Family in other states, new opportunities in other ministries, and memories of prior effectiveness in other roles begin to pull, enticing them to leave.
What is the solution? We should start fewer urban churches—at least in the beginning.
We need to engage our cities by increasing our long-term incarnational efforts. I am about to disappoint a few church starters, but we need to do so by reducing our funding. We need to send men and women to our cities with skills to work in the marketplace so they will be financially self-sufficient and integrated into the community. We need to prepare them to make disciples and to influence the domains of society with kingdom values before they begin congregating new churches. They need to go with a calling to make disciples in their city, and this calling should supersede a fixation on starting a church. A few reasons will explain why incarnational disciple making must be our first priority:
- Urban churches usually take longer to develop. A number of examples exist where an urban church start experienced a growth pattern over 7-10 years that a suburban church start experienced in its first or second year.
- Long-term funding is unrealistic and non-reproducible. Funding should not dictate kingdom expansion and growth. If we are to reach all the people groups of our cities, we cannot begin with the limits of our partnership support. We have to find ways to move to the city and “plant our own gardens.”
- Funding plans, typically not more than 3 years, contribute to the strains which push/pull a church starter to leave.
- By fixating on a church start, the goal becomes the growth of the congregation rather than making disciples of all the peoples in a metropolis.
- Many church starters transition quickly from the role of evangelist/church starter to the role of chaplain. As a chaplain, they focus on the spiritual and relational needs of their group, not on reaching the city.










